Caryn offered to tutor Dottie in business law for six hours on the day before the final exam in return for $100. Dottie responded, "Let me think about it for a day, okay?" Two hours alter Jim offered Caryn $150 to tutor him on the day before the final and she accepted. Dottie called Caryn an hour later and said, "I accept." Caryn said, I'm sorry but I've already agreed to tutor Jim that day so I can't tutor you."
Was there a contract between Caryn and Dottie? Explain.
There was no contract. Caryn only offered Dottie something. Dottie never accepted any offer.
ReplyDeleteNo. There was no agreement. She should have taken the offer right then.
ReplyDeleteNo, because Dottie, had not agreed to it right away. Caryn and Dottie did not fully agree on the terms before Jim had offered Caryn more money.
ReplyDeleteNo. The second agreement is invalid because Caryn didn't put an amount of time on the offer. Dottie shoulf have the offer.
ReplyDeleteNo. There was no contract agreement. She should have taken the offer right when it was made to her.
ReplyDeleteNo, because there was no agreement between her and Dottie. They did not fully agree on terms together.
ReplyDeleteNo because there was no serious agreement. It was only a negotiation. An offer came up to her and she accepted.
ReplyDeleteNo. There was no contract agreement.
ReplyDeleteThe two had no contract that they agreed on. It was just somthing the agree with each other as a social agreement.
ReplyDeleteTook me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained! Criminal law
ReplyDeleteThanks for give me information on this topic. Private Tutor in Vero Beach you have sharing very nice post.
ReplyDeletevanity leads to more plastic surgery procedures. people are becoming more conscious about their appearance- Law tutor
ReplyDelete