*REQUIRED*
A month after his release from jail, Bill Bravo insured his own life
in a double indemnity policy. Two months later, he was killed while attempting to hold up a bank. The insurance company refused to pay the benefits to Bill's wife and son, even though the policy contained no provision excluding liability if the insured died as a result of violating the law.
Under what legal grounds can the insurance company refuse to pay this claim? Explain.
They can say they don't insure criminals. maybe. I don't know.
ReplyDeleteSince he willfullly broke the law, the terms of the contract are voided. Perhaps so. Maybe we should've gone over this.
ReplyDeletethey can say he broke the law. they can say he died in criminal acts so they dont insure criminals. i agree with those 2 i don't know
ReplyDeleteThey could say that they don't insure criminals.
ReplyDeleteBecause he was trying to steal money they don't got to pay his claim. He also just bought the life insurance. He also was just out of jail.
ReplyDeleteI feel that they should have to because there were no exclusions. They more than likely knew that he had just gotten out of jail, and they chose to insure him, but they should have made the exemptions more clear.
ReplyDeletesince he broke the law they should claim of not knowing about his pasr
ReplyDeleteBill Bravo broke the law. They could say that they don't want to insure criminals.
ReplyDeleteThey should have to insure them because they have no exclusion, they probably knew that he had just gotten out. And could insure him
ReplyDeleteBravo 3 benefits
ReplyDeleteBravo 3 Benefit Auctions and Consulting Group - Bravo Auctions offers Bravo 3 benefits, Paddle Raise, Live Auction Fundraising Services to Non-Profit Organizations throughout the Midwest.
to get more - https://www.bravobenefitauctions.com//